markcreekwater

I WRITE ESSAYs

CHAPTER 15: WHAT ARE “GRAVITY WAVES” ??

CHAPTER 15:  WHAT ARE “GRAVITY WAVES” ??

“Gravity is an EMERGENT phenomenon” —Erik Verlinde, Dutch PhD-holder

Recently I attended an excellent presentation (at Princeton’s Institute for Advanced Study) regarding the recent observation of “gravity waves.”  Though Einstein predicted them, and though many researchers have, for many years, tried to observe them, it seems that the folks at LIGO [Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory] have made the first successful observation and measurement of gravity waves.

According to the presenters, the observed + measured gravity waves were from two “black holes” —(each containing the mass of approx. 30 of our suns)— which merged together with each other, producing a larger + more massive “black hole”.

However, Dr. Ernest Sternglass’s model [Ref.#1] predicts exactly the opposite:  his Electron-Positron Pair Model of Matter predicts that a certain kind of object, {it can have almost any mass, from that of a galaxy to that of a pi-meson}, will eventually divide in half, producing two objects, each containing half the mass.  He calls these objects “cosmological systems” — and says that his model predicts that there are millions of them throughout our universe, and that they constitute the vast majority of the “DARK MATTER” in our universe, and that, every once in a while, a big one will explode, producing a “quasar” — also called a “gamma-ray burster.”

Sternglass calls these explosions “delayed mini-Bangs” — and says that his model predicts them to be happening during all the time since the start of the “Big Bang.”  He says that these delayed mini-Bangs are very similar to the Big Bang, but involve less matter and energy:  and he says that they do, in fact, produce newly formed neutrons, most of which quickly “decay” — forming forming.

IN OTHER WORDs:  if Sternglass is right about this, then the standard model’s explanation for “quasars” is TOTALLY WRONG:  because the standard model explains a “quasar” as the result of a very large “black hole” sucking in some surrounding ordinary matter, causing some of that matter’s energy to radiate outwardly, according to Einstein’s famous  E = mc2. 

According to Sternglass, NOTHING GETS SUCKED IN, and large amounts of stuff come out, including high-energy gamma rays, and newly formed protons + neutrons.  So these objects are more like WHITE HOLES !! 

Therefore, based on Sternglass’s model, I predict that astronomers and astrophysicists will eventually realize that the “gravity wave” signals which the folks at LIGO observed are from an object which contained the mass of approx. 60 of our suns, which divided in half, producing two objects with approx. 30 solar masses each.

If this be true, then one can use Sternglass’s theory to predict when the next signal from these two objects will arrive, as they divide in half again, producing four objects, each containing approx. 15 solar masses.

The formula is easy + simple:

T = (4.9 x 10^20 seconds) x [the square root of (Mobject / Muniverse)],  where “T” is elapsed time until the next signal, “Mobject” is the mass of the object which divides in half, “Muniverse” is the mass of our universe, and  “10^20″ means “ten to the 20th power” — i.e., a one with 20 zeros after it.

Using this formula, one can calculate that astronomers might receive the next gravity wave signals from the system after approx. 30 years.  While this is a long time to wait for a signal, I’m predicting it, based on Sternglass’s theory.

Hopefully, as the folks at LIGO improve their techniques, they will eventually observe some gravity wave signals from an object whose mass is approx. that of our sun.  If so, then one can predict that the next signal from that much smaller system might arrive approx. five years later.

Sincerely,  Mark Creek-water Dorazio, ApE (amateur-physics-enthusiast), Princeton, New Jersey, USA,  2-March-2016

########### <<END OF CHAPTER 15 >> ###########

Advertisements

One comment on “CHAPTER 15: WHAT ARE “GRAVITY WAVES” ??

  1. Pingback: book-title: VISUALIZE-ING “QUARKs” — sub-title: Essays re the Work of DR. ERNEST STERNGLASS + DR. MENAHEM SIMHONY | markcreekwater

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on March 2, 2016 by .
%d bloggers like this: