markcreekwater

I WRITE ESSAYs

essay: REGARDING “PRIMER FIELDS” AND THE WORK OF Dr. DAVID LAPOINT

REGARDING “PRIMER FIELDS” AND THE WORK OF Dr. DAVID LAPOINT

“Nature doesn’t deal with dualities, paradoxes or contradictions.  Judgments like these are created by mankind, not understanding a certain phenomenon.  Physical science should not accept these kinds of judgements”  —–Sjaak Uitterdijk, retired engineer, Netherlands … ####################################################################

PART 1:  Dr. LAPOINT’s MODEL

I recently discovered a new+improved concept in physics when I viewed a Youtube-video which Dr. David Lapoint posted on 1-Feb-2013 … Here’s the LINK:        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EPlyiW-xGI

This new+improved concept works for very large objects like galaxies + stars, and also for very small objects like atoms + sub-atomic “particles” …  This is very exciting for me, as an amateur physics enthusiast, as it should be for anyone who wants to know the truth regarding how our Mother Nature works …

{[ The word “particle” appears inside quotation marks, due to my sincere belief that one can view every so-called “particle” as also a SYSTEM:  specifically, as a system of electrons + positrons, which Dr. Sternglass says are the only fundamental “particles” … “The evidence suggested to me, then and now, that the electron and positron are the ultimate stable entities with which the universe began. They are the only truly indivisible elementary particles that have been observed in the laboratory” [Sternglass, p.207, REF.#1] ]} …

There are 3 parts to this revolutionary and revelationary video, each approx. an hour long:  as I viewed PART-1 for the first time, I immediately formed the opinion that Lapoint, {(like)}, totally “GETs” it …

This series of videos is a proverbial “breath of fresh air” for physics enthusiasts world-wide, whether one holds a PhD or never finished high school:  the truth which Dr. Lapoint presents is so obvious that anybody, regardless of how much schooling he or she had, can enjoy them … It’s like that old 1950s TV-show “Watch Mr. Wizard” — which I’m old enough to remember watching on TV during 1950s:  very simple and easy to understand …
Using a minimal amount of equipment, which any high-school science-lab can afford to purchase, Dr. Lapoint blows the high-priced —(yet essentially incorrect)— “STANDARD-MODEL” theories off the table …
Literally:  in PART-1 of the series, beaming a knowing smile toward the camera, he’s set up on a table three little light-weight aluminum bottles, labeled “BLACK HOLES” + “DARK MATTER” + “DARK ENERGY”:  one-by-one, using one of his patented, inexpensive, magnetized bowls, he shoots three little magnetic steel balls at them, which knocks them off the table …
This is a direct contrast to what they do at CERN, in Switzerland, where they use equipment which cost billion$$$$$ for “research” —– which is no more substantial than smashing tiny sub-atomic “particles” together, harder than ever before in the history of science, and then noting that they get smaller + heavier stuff than ever before …
NOTE #1:  ironically, in “particle physics” smaller “particles” might be heavier …
NOTE #2:  each of these smaller and smaller, increasingly exotic, short-living, never before seen, sub-atomic objects is no more substantial than a tiny blip of energy, because that’s what it really is:  a tiny little blip of energy:  PhD-holders should ***KNOW*** better than to talk as if these objects can in any way or shape or form be considered “particles” … SHAME ON THEM !!
As Dr. Lapoint explains it, 30 minutes into PART-1:
“ YOU SHOULD BE STARTING TO UNDERSTAND THAT A CRITICAL MISTAKE WAS MADE WHEN SCIENTISTs ASSUMED THAT THE MAGNETIC FIELDs EMINATING FROM MATTER SUCH AS ATOMs WAS DUE TO A SIMPLE BAR-SHAPED MAGNETIC-FIELD WITHIN THE ATOMs … THIS ASSUMPTION LET TO MANY ILL-FORMED IDEAs AS TO THE TRUE FORCEs AT WORK, FROM THE SUB-ATOMIC LEVEL TO THE GALACTIC LEVEL … CORRECT THIS ONE BASIC MISUNDERSTANDING AND THEN MANY DIFFICULT PROBLEMs IN SCIENCE BECOME VERY CLEAR, AND EASY TO UNDERSTAND ” …
At 35:22 he summarizes this:  “WE MADE SOME FATAL MISTAKES IN OUR THINKING” …
####################################################################
Basically Dr. Lapoint’s theory (i.e., “model”, as all the koool-dudes say) says that magnetics are the primary forces in our universe, and that other forces, electrical and gravitational, derive from magnetics …
He shows that magnetics rule the movements + structures + behaviors of large objects like galaxies and stars, and also of small objects like atoms + sub-atomic stuff … In one video he convincingly demonstrates —(and verbally characterizes)— these everywhere-present magnetic forces as the true definition of the so-called “strong nuclear force” —–as it works inside the nucleus of an atom … [This is at 20:56 in PART-1 of the video-series {“THE PRIMER FIELDS”}] …
{There’s an interesting side-note here: Dr. MENAHEM SIMHONY [REF.#2, or google “Simhony tribute”]—— has already, since the 1970s, shown us that gravitational forces derive from electromagnetic forces} …

{PLUS:  a 2nd interesting side-note:  Dr. ERNEST STERNGLASS, in his book [REF.#1], shows that the “strong nuclear force” is just simply the familiar “electromagnetic” force, “relativistically” increased … If one does not understand the term “relativistically increased” ——– then one might want to obtain a copy of Sternglass’s book BEFORE THE BIG BANG (1997, 2001)} …

{[ For a SUMMARY of Sternglass’s and Simhony’s models, go to PART 2 of this essay ]} …

If one has any interest in learning how our universe really works, then one might want to view Dr. Lapoint’s videos:  believe it or not, this is how real physics gets done these days, because the internet is, [{like]}, way better than any communication technology which average folks have ever had access to, until now, in human history:  I reckon that if Einstein were still alive, he would spend hours every day at his computer, which would, I reckon, be located in his “study room” on the second floor of his little house at 112 Mercer Street in Princeton, New Jersey, USA …
{[ NOTE:  after he settled in Princeton, Einstein never went back to Germany, not even to visit, after what German folks did to his people during World War 2 ]} …
Einstein had a very good “bullshit filter” … A corollary to this is that he also had a very good ability to recognize the truth …
He said that it constantly amazed him to see that many highly-educated and intelligent scientists just simply were not able to distinguish between a good theory and a bad theory …
He also said that one should be able to explain one’s theory to a young child, or to “a barmaid”:  Dr. Lapoint’s theory is like this:  understandable to both barmaids and young children, and in fact to anybody with an ounce of honest curiosity and/or wonder re how our universe works …
I’m quite sure that if Einstein were still with us, he would {(like)} totally embrace Dr. Lapoint’s model …
SO:  I invite you to go to  http://www.YOUTUBE.com  and input “THE PRIMER FIELDS” into the little “search box” at the top of the home page there … enjoy !!

Sincerely,  Mark “Truth-lover” Creek-water Dorazio,  Newark-Delaware-USA,

age-65,  24-March-2013,  MARK.CREEKWATER@gmail.com
=====>> “AWARE, IN DELAWARE” <<=====

PART 2:  SUMMARY OF STERNGLASS’s AND SIMHONY’s MODELs

In my quest to learn the truth re how nature works, I discovered the work of 2 retired physicists who are, sadly, almost unknown:  not only to the general-public, but also to their colleagues in the physics community … This is not because they are “crack-pots”, as one might suspect, but because of how difficult it is to get one’s paper published if it differs too radically with the standard model … Sad, but true …

 

Dr. Sternglass worked many years, mostly during his free time, to develop a new PROTON MODEL which is very different from the standard model’s proton model … It’s in the last chapter of his book [Ref.#1], publish’d in 1997 … The entire book leads up to the last chapter:  in addition to explaining many of the complicated mysteries of this difficult subject, the book tells about some of Sternglass’s adventures as a working scientist, such as his 1947 meeting with EINSTEIN, where they talked re physics + philosophy in their first language, GERMAN …

Dr. Simhony, likewise, worked many years to develop his “EPOLA MODEL OF SPACE” [Ref. #2] … “EPOLA” is short for “ELECTRON-POSITRON LATTICE” … This is the aether-like substance in Simhony’s model, composed entirely of electrons + positrons, which permeates our universe, like a very very large 3-dimensional fish-net, inter-penetrating all the ordinary matter in our universe, and helping to explain why protons + other “particles” behave as they do … It’s similar to the “aether” in which 19th-century scientists believed, but substantially different from it … One can not hope to properly understand nuclear physics without understanding Simhony’s model, or some other believable model which involves some kind of aether-like substance in our universe …

By publishing this series of essays, I hope to help the general public, and the physics community, to become aware of the work of these 2 elderly gentlemen, ages 91 and 92 in 2014 … The idea that electrons + positrons combine to form all the different kinds of “particles” in our universe is refreshing and awesome, as it helps to simplify our understandings regarding how nature works … It’s analogous to the discovery that all the different kinds of “stuff” in our world are composed of only less than a hundred chemical elements, and the discovery that every ATOM is composed of only THREE things, i.e., protons + neutrons + electrons …

By showing us that both PROTONs + NEUTRONs are composed of hi-speed —(and there-fore “RELATIVISTIC”)— ELECTRONs + POSITRONs, Sternglass has simply reduced this number from THREE to TWO … Similarly, by affirming the existence of an aether-like substance, which permeates our universe, inter-penetrating all the ordinary matter in it, Simhony has explained the origin of the various + sundry “FIELDs” which are said to permeate space:  so one can now understand that these “fields” are due to interactions between “particles” and the elements which compose this aether-like substance …

#####################################################################

Recently I did a presentation re Dr. Sternglass’s work, at CORNELL UNIVERSITY, where he earn’d his PhD in 1953 … Tho only six people showed up, it was a wonderful success … A professor + a grad-student were among the six participants, as was Dr. Sternglass’s son … Toward the end of the presentation we were talking about the so-called “J/psi particle”, which researchers discover’d in 1974 … {Please google “J/psi particle”, if you need to} …

I explain’d that Sternglass says in his book [Ref.#1] that this discovery was good news for him, as it indicated to him that his still very unfinished proton model was ON THE RIGHT TRACK, inspiring him to re-continue developing the model, which he had not done for several years …

As the professor at my presentation explained it, the discovery of the J/psi confirmed “quark” theory … I had a problem with this, because Sternglass says, in his book, that the discovery of the J/psi “apparently required the existence of yet another kind of quark” and “The discovery of the Upsilon just a few years later required still another type of quark” [p.188, REF.#1] … So I did some research, and found a fascinating description of the details of the actual discovery process on pages 265-274 of a book titled THE QUANTUM STORY (2011) by JIM BAGGOTT …

According to that account, even before their experimental results confirmed the existence of the J/psi, the researchers who discovered it had already suspected that they would need a new “quark” to make the J/psi fit into the “quark” model … [At that time, the theory had only three kinds of “quarks” — the “UP-quark” + the “DOWN-quark” + the “STRANGE-quark”] … After reading that account, I realized that the professor might be right:  i.e., in the sense that the researchers suspected that they would need a new “quark”, even before they confirmed the existence of the J/psi “particle”, one can argue that the discovery of the “J/psi” actually did confirm that quark theory was also “on the right track” …

In HIS book [REF.#1], Sternglass says that he was able to explain the existence of the J/psi, (and also its close cousin, the Upsilon “particle”, discovered several years later), without adding anything new, by using only speedy-electrons + speedy-positrons to model them … For this reason, I suspect that Sternglass’s model might be EQUIVALENT TO THE QUARK MODEL, and also superior to it — because it’s MORE-SIMPLE … So now I’m in the process of trying to learn enough quark theory to demonstrate the EQUIVALENCE of the 2 models … Meanwhile, I trust WILLIAM OF OCCAM (1287-1348), who once said (in LATIN, one reckons): “Do not add new things without necessity” …

REF. #1:  Sternglass, Ernest;  book:  “BEFORE THE BIG BANG” (1997, REVISED 2001);

REF. #2:  Simhony, Menahem;  internet-sites:  http://www.EPOLA.org    http://www.EPOLA.co.uk …

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Advertisements

One comment on “essay: REGARDING “PRIMER FIELDS” AND THE WORK OF Dr. DAVID LAPOINT

  1. Pingback: BOOK-TITLE: ESSAYS RE THE WORK OF DR. ERNEST STERNGLASS + DR. MENAHEM SIMHONY | markcreekwater

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on February 25, 2015 by .
%d bloggers like this: