markcreekwater

I WRITE ESSAYs

APPENDIX5: PLEASE IGNORE THIS, AS IT’s TOO SPECULATIVE

APPENDIX5:  PLEASE IGNORE THIS, AS IT’s TOO SPECULATIVE …

“Faraday … overcame … a lack of mathematical training to become renowned for his … prodigious scientific imagination”  —–quoted from the dust jacket of a book by Nancy Forbes + Basil Mahon, titled “Faraday, Maxwell, and the Electromagnetic Field” (2014)

ARE THERE “MAGNETIC CURRENTs” ??

DR. DAVID LaPOINT has posted a series of youtube videos, titled “The Primer Fields” which are quite good:  to view them, just simply go to http://www.YOUTUBE.com and input “PRIMER FIELDS” into the SEARCH BOX …

These youtube videos are ALL ABOUT MAGNETICs:  I reckon that there are still some BIG LOTs of stuff which the average physicist just simply doesn’t know re how things behave under the influence of MAGNETIC FORCEs …

Please view at least one of these videos, because (1) they are, in my opinion, excellent,  and  (2) they might help make my hypothesis re “magnetic flow currents” (below) seem more believable …

HYPOTHESIS RE “MAGNETIC FLOW CURRENTS” — [remember: “magnetic” is “mag’ic”]:

SIMILARLY to how Faraday and Maxwell hypothesized the existence of “magnetic field lines” going thru their “aether”,  one can hypothesize (for the “EPO-LATTICE” in Dr.Simhony’s model) the existence of “MAGNETIC FLOW CURRENTs”, flowing at a high rate of speed (the speed of light ??), energetically, thru the very narrow, very long magnetic field lines which constitute the epo-lattice …

One can supposed, (for the sake of this essay), the possibility that these magnetic-flow-currents go thru the epo-lattice in a cubical pattern, aligned in three [3] mutually-perpendicular orientations, forming the epo-lattice as Dr. Simhony describes it … One can hypothesize that the flow currents in adjacent field lines flow in opposite directions, so that adjacent field lines would attract each other, like bar magnets attract each other … One can hypothesize that these magnetic flow currents (if they exist) blow and/or flow EVER SINCE THE “BIG BANG” — because there is no friction to slow them down …

One needs a bit of creative imagination to visualize this:  I’ve never seen this hypothesis in any book or published paper or article or science story … So it’s definitely not a part of the “standard model” …

How long would these hypothetical magnetic flow currents be ??  As long as the diameter of our universe … How near to each other would they be ??  So near to each other that one would need  > 10,000 of them, all parallel and lined up side-by-side, to cover the distance from a sodium atom’s nucleus to the nearest chlorine atom’s nucleus, in a salt-crystal …

{( Dr.Simhony actually had the !!AHA!!-moment which inspired him to develop his “Electron-Positron Lattice [EPO-LATTICE] Model of Space” while working with salt crystals in a physics-lab … Google his “SIMHONY TRIBUTE” internet-site for details )} …

HYPOTHESIS:  at some time in the remote past, there was a very very highly energetic and powerful event, (perhaps a “big crunch” — the opposite of a “big bang”), whose effect was to create these hypothetical magnetic flow currents, in a CUBICAL form, because this might be the most efficient way to store energy in a 3-dimensional space … Perhaps this hypothesis might explain the origin of the mutually-perpendicular lines of Dr. Simhony’s model ??

Perhaps one can demonstrate that a cubic lattice is the most efficient way to store energy in 3-dimensional space ??

Perhaps one can IMAGINE THIS AS A PROBLEM FOR AN ENGINEER designing a heating system to heat the inside of a very large box-like structure ??  Perhaps this heating system might consist of a set of pipes, with hot air blowing thru them ??  If one wants to know what arrangement of pipes would transfer heat most efficiently, perhaps the only two contenders for this honor would be the cubical pattern described above, and a hexagonal and/or tetrahedral pattern ??  If one arranges the pipes in a hexagonal pattern, perhaps by imagining that TETRAHEDRONs (instead of CUBEs) fill the space, or by visualizing oranges stacked up on a shelf in a grocery store, then can one calculate the length of pipe needed to serve a given volume of space …  When I did this, I found that it’s more than that needed to serve a given volume of space if the pipes are arranged in a cubical pattern …

That is why I say that the cubical pattern might be the most efficient pattern for storing energy … Perhaps, in the remote past, there was some kind of “big crunch” —(the opposite of a “big bang”)— in which all the stuff in our universe, [(including epola-stuff)], collapsed down into a very tiny volume ??  Perhaps this hypothetical “big crunch” created the presently existing epo-lattice, as a way to absorb the very very large ENERGY SURGE which such an event would surely cause ??

Perhaps the hypothesized magnetic flow currents are the primary energy sources in our universe ??  Perhaps everything else exists because of them ??  For example: if one assumes that they form a cubic lattice, then one can wonder what might happen at the place where three [3] of the mutually perpendicular “flow currents” intersect … Perhaps they might swirl in a way which stabilizes, (or even “creates” ??), the electron-positron pair which one finds at the intersection ??  Like a 3-dimensional freeway interchange, where, instead of cars + trucks, one finds magnetic flow currents ??  Perhaps the ep-pair at the intersection is what keeps the flows from mixing ??  I can visualize that — can you ??

Following Sternglass, one can visualize each epola-element as consisting of an ep-pair, whose e and p rotate (i.e., “orbit”) around each other at almost the speed of light, and also “SPIN” as they “rotate” or “orbit” … {can one visualize “spins” teaming up with “rotations” to produce “swirls”??  or “vortexes” ??} … Sternglass is very specific re the nature of the “spins”:  he says that the electron and positron spin in OPPOSITE directions, so that the 2 MAGNETIC FIELDs associated with them point in the SAME direction, and in fact ADD …  Instead of hypothesizing that these magnetic fields are what hold the lattice together, one can hypothesize the CONVERSE:  perhaps the ep-pairs are what prevent the hypothesized magnetic-flow-currents from flowing together and collapsing the lattice ??  Similar to how the complex arrangement of on-ramps + off-ramps at a freeway interchange prevent speeding cars + trucks from crashing into each other ??  Perhaps, in this way, one can do an “end run” around “Earnshaw’s theorem” ??

$$$$$$$$$$$ << END OF APPENDIX5 >> $$$$$$$$$$$

Advertisements

One comment on “APPENDIX5: PLEASE IGNORE THIS, AS IT’s TOO SPECULATIVE

  1. Pingback: BOOK-TITLE: ESSAYS RE THE WORK OF DR. ERNEST STERNGLASS + DR. MENAHEM SIMHONY | markcreekwater

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on February 17, 2015 by .
%d bloggers like this: